It's official: I'm a published Tweeter!
I was pleased to find out this morning that one of my tweets about the Canada Line was published in 24 Hours! This news came courtesy of Rob White- whom my tweet was a reply to
For the rest of this week, the current issues can be downloaded here: http://vancouver.24hrs.ca/PDF/
Check out the Wednesday edition and read the second-last tweet aimed @rbostyle
This is pretty exciting news, albeit sort of silly to get excited about : P
What I find so neat is that they came across my message, and deemed it worthy of print.
It was about how I think the name, “Canada Line” is pretty stupid. I assume they named it this because of the Olympics- something I’m getting tired of. I mean, the Olympics will be fun, but do some things here for the people HERE. All of our concerns are about how we’ll look and how we can extract money from visitors and return visitors.
Wayne, Clarisse, and I were talking about how that’s stupid (naming it Canada Line for the Olympics) and Wayne reminded us that the original name was the RAV Line.
RAV Line. SO much better! It stands for Richmond, Airport, Vancouver. That has meaning! Canada Line doesn’t say anything about it. It’s a short, west-coast connection between two cities and the airport. While it’s shiny and new, it’s an upgrade to our current rapid-transit line, the SkyTrain. We want to get the RAV line name sticking, I think it’s much better.
I rode it the other day and was impressed by the size of the cars and station areas. Although, I think the cars should have many more seats. While I only rode it for one stop, I found it quick and quiet. Overall, useful. But, was it worth shutting down a major street and putting small businesses out of business? I’m not sure. I mean, it cost $2B. I wasn’t aware BC had that sort of money! 3 years also seems like a long build time. In my eyes, construction takes too long these days. I mean, get it done right, but do it faster. Maybe I don’t quite understand the scale of the project, and so I’m not totally sticking to my opinion on the build speed.
Anyways, the Canada Line is a mixed bag, in my eyes. For one, I think there was a lot of money misspent (as usual) and the name is dumb. Oh, and the lack of seats. On the other hand, it’s nice to see transportation progress, the bike/pedestrian bridge under the train bridge sounds neat (should make for some great panorama photos), and the structures that I have seen are of a pretty impressive scale- even though they are being called bland by others.
Last, what were they thinking when they named the exit the way out? We’re not the UK!
Let’s be ourselves! Call it the RAV line, use exits, give people a place to sit. Yeesh!
-adam